Challenges in Standardizing Legal Data Across Different Jurisdictions

Hello

I’ve been working with legal datasets on the Justice Hub platform and noticed a significant challenge in standardizing data formats across different jurisdictions. Legal frameworks; case structures & terminology vary widely, making it difficult to create a unified dataset for comparative analysis. This inconsistency often leads to errors in data interpretation and visualization. :innocent:

Has anyone faced similar issues while working with legal datasets? Are there any best practices or tools that can help standardize case data; ensuring consistency across different states or countries? :thinking: I’d love to hear insights from those who have tackled this challenge.
Checked https://forum.justicehub.in/c/date-with-data/14- Splunk guide related to this and found it quite informative.

Additionally; if there are any previous Date with Data discussions that touched on legal data standardization; please share relevant links. A structured approach to formatting legal data could greatly improve accessibility & usability for researchers and policymakers. :thinking:

Thank you!! :slightly_smiling_face: